Most guys don’t care much about getting laid, I hypothesize

THE GAME comes out in 2005, MYSTERY METHOD a year later. A bunch of pickup blogs show up then too, almost all abandoned since, and sometimes descending into madness and/or conspiracy theories along the way. Few guys have any desire to write about pickup and chicks for more than a few years, and the ones who do are often, or usually, unbalanced, or nuts in some other way(s).[1] A few years ago (2015) the book MATE: BECOME THE MAN WOMEN WANT, by Geoffrey Miller and Tucker Max, also came out, but it didn’t seem to make a splash. In a major occasion on par with the moon landing, Red Quest as a blog is founded in 2017, its initiation commemorated by a massive, 10-ten granite ziggurat next to the Washington Monument in DC. Red Quest’s readership peak is 2019, as of this writing, although you never know, maybe some feminist tweeters will come along to denounce me, and thus drive up traffic.[2] Most people who find their way here from twitter or reddit, belong to twitter or reddit, and aren’t much interested in other venues. Some people complain about centralization of power among big tech companies, but the vast majority of people’s actions show preference for big centralized platforms, not for decentralized, censorship-resistant efforts (describing what seems to be true is not the same as approving of a thing that seems to be true).

What’s going on? Knowledge about how to do better with chicks is available, but few guys seems to avail themselves of it. Chicks themselves are not out there talking about the excessive number of socially smooth, interesting, and cool guys who are seducing them. If anything, chicks are complaining about how cold it is to meet guys through online dating, and how they wish guys would approach them in real life. Chicks are lonely, bored, and understimulated, by their own admission. Memes about funny cats go viral, ideas about how to get laid, don’t. I post that most guys just don’t care that much about getting laid, and even the ones who somewhat care, don’t care or care much about figuring out how to do so effectively. The information itself has been around for at least a decade and a half, probably longer, and it’s still very niche.

Some guys still seem to think that doing better with chicks is simply impossible: and yet the guys who practice the game demonstrate otherwise. Or maybe most guys really aren’t picky, and are okay dating a few points below themselves. They perceive the mountain to be too high, and go back to the Shire of video games. I know a coach who says his clients think a same-day lay (SDL) is impossible, because it’s so far out from their idea of what’s possible.

Overall, it’s not like men are better at getting laid via some other avenue. Men seem to be getting laid less than they did a few years back, which is also consistent with the “most guys don’t care much” thesis. You’ve probably seen the graphs showing that the number of guys in their teens / 20s who have gone without sex in the last year has something like doubled, or maybe a bit more, from like 8% to like 22%, in the last ten to twelve years:

Number of video gamers and herbivores seems to be going up, which is I guess kind of nice from a “competition” level, but existentially depressing from a societal and cultural level. Maybe one day humanity goes extinct cause the video games are too good. Maybe the effort and subtlety needed to master the art of seduction is too great. Most guys have returned to an oral-first culture, and thus the extensive written corpus about how to get laid lies fallow, for want of readers. In a similar human puzzle, Why aren’t there more computer science majors? It’s probably the most lucrative undergrad degree, and highly impactful on the average person’s life (the average person spends an unbelievable number of hours per day on the phone, which is another way of saying, “Doing things CS majors produce”). Lots of people go to college, get worthless degrees, and spend the next decade plus paying back “student” loans that can’t be discharged via normal means like bankruptcy. Weird! I hypothesize most people aren’t smart enough to do computer science degrees but maybe there are other reasons. Most guys are smart enough to implement the rudimentary parts of game, however, they just don’t. Maybe guys are just lazy?

Some of the guys who download and read the book probably don’t do anything with its ideas right away, but a planted seed may sprout years down the line. Could be that “time” is a key element for ideas to spread. But ideas from THE GAME and such have had a long time to spread, and seem not to have. Video game ideas, by the contrast, appeal to many millions.

There seemed to be a lot of energy in the pickup and seduction worlds in the ’00s and early ’10s. Where’d it go? Guys in their 20s don’t seem to be writing about seduction and dating experiences (if I’m missing guys who are, let me know). Maybe, today, being in good shape, a male high 7, and having okay pictures of a guy looking buff and hiking or whatever, is enough to snare high 6s and some 7s off dating apps, so the drama of cold approach and bar seduction isn’t needed. The process is a little smoother, its terrifying peaks and valleys and storms smoothed into a neater, more manicured path. Meanwhile the guys playing video games and getting fat are mostly out of the game altogether, or get women consistent with their lives. A guy who gets frustrated enough with his underperforming sex life will find his way to the knowledge and information sources that still exist, and that are findable via search.

Maybe this sort of thing will always be of interest to only a small group, for some other reason I’m not aware of. Maybe I’ve not plumbed the psychology of man sufficiently to discern it. I think I’d imagined that Red Quest as a blog would be more enticing: more efficient, and often effective, ways of getting copiously laid. Even if most guys aren’t interested in undertaking these practices, I imagined they’d be interested in or curious about them. They’re powerful tools, however unusual.

I don’t have much of a conclusion. Whatever makes ideas popular, does not appear to apply to guys figuring out how to get laid.


[1]The last year and a half have been revealing. I’ve speculated in private that I think this universe is self-limiting, because the accurate and useful ideas about, for example, picking up chicks, are often swirled together with a bunch of other off-putting, inaccurate, and widely disliked ideas: a bunch of anti-social people discussing social skills.
[2]If you know any, direct them here, so they can denounce. Ten years ago, it seemed like pickup artists and such were regularly denounced online and in the media, and now, no one does. It seems the culture wars have moved on. By the way, we lost, at least in terms of numbers and attention.

Author: The Red Quest

How can we live and be in society?

24 thoughts on “Most guys don’t care much about getting laid, I hypothesize”

  1. >> A few years ago (2015) the book MATE: BECOME THE MAN WOMEN WANT, by Geoffrey Miller and Tucker Max, also came out, but it didn’t seem to make a splash

    This was the book that got me into Game, actually*

    Not completely true, I had read some Roosh before, but it actively got me into online fucking apps.

    Like

    1. MATE is a good book… but also one I feel like I rarely see referenced/discussed… it’s also nice because unlike harder core books, it can be given to younger guys w/o their moms flipping out.

      Like

  2. You are right, they are not interested enough, or at least not working to get laid. There are many factors. Incels are also used to ‘virtual’ women, so they find ‘real’ ones not so attractive.
    In many forums you can see them voting famous attractive women and still finding them like ‘just 7/10’ because they don’t like the eyes or the tits are too small. Basically they have got used to unreality.

    Then you have the guys who are attractive but have zero game. They expect girls to hit on them. This creates another external wrong perspective: ‘either girls hit on you or you have no chances with them’. We see this specially at online dating.

    Another angle is the risky culture of dating. Meeting a random girl, an average attractive woman, taking her to your house, maybe do unprotected sex, without serious prospects, some soft guys don’t like all those ideas. They want a experience they can control 100%.

    For those guys thirty of new experiences, with no shame on being horny, not looking for a 10/10 but just a Yes/no woman the possibilities have increased a lot.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I remember fondly the heady excitement of the “seduction community” in the first decade of the millennium. During 2000-2003, the Usenet group alt.seduction.fast was where the seed germinated, where guys with psuedonyms like Maniac High, MrSex4uNYC, Franco/Zarathustra_fi, Rio, nightlight9, Svengali, and of course, Style and Mystery, worked out a relentlessly experimental approach to seduction science (I say that without irony) based on field reports and repeatable results, insofar as there is any predictability to chicks. There was a feeling that they were unearthing facts about female human nature that were original and better than anything the psychologists could tease out. Sure, maybe Ovid and Shakespeare understood negging in their bones, but it took Mystery to break negging down into patterns that an engineer can apply with consistent outcomes.

    I took one of the first Mystery Method workshops in 2002 and saw with my own eyes Mystery doing feats of social engineering with lines of cute girls that dropped my jaw. I also took workshops from later entrants Vince DiCarlo, Lance Mason, and Juggler circa 2003-2007, and learned amazing things from all of them. The way I touch women today is still thanks largely to Vince and Lance, and I attribute many of my relationships to the fact that those guys taught me nonverbal escalation. Aside from Mystery’s immense contributions, one of the best innovations was “DiCarlo Drills”, and I’m sad it’s in the past: Vince and company had the students actually physically practice “kino” (touch), body language, and other nonverbal moves on Vince and company, so you get the skills right into your muscle memory. I never became a great seducer myself, but I rose far from my initial ineptitude.

    The excitement died down around 2010, and I’m not entirely sure why. Cell-phone raised boys just aren’t as interested in socializing? Testosterone is lower? The war against masculinity reached its triumphant conclusion and most guys think they should be embarrassed to want sex? Online dating and the decline of nightlife as an effective way to meet? Did the seduction community go as far as it could go, and there wasn’t much new left to discover? (No.) One of the spooky things about 2020 is that we’ve entered a time when nothing is cooler than conformity, repeating the Narrative, and zealously advancing the goals and policies of an unprecedentedly huge and powerful global establishment (while still fancying oneself a “rebel”, a Boomer/lefty habit that persists against all the evidence that oneself is absolutely opposed to rebellion). MeToo, baby! Sorry, uh, I didn’t mean to compare you to a baby…

    Though I don’t comment much, I love your blog, one of the few extensions of that huge outburst of creativity that really got going circa 2000 and petered out after a decade. Other extensions I like are Krauser, Nash, RedPillDad, Yohami, Blackdragon, and the Swoop the World forum. I’m glad the flame never died.

    Like

    1. This paragraph is a lot of what I’ve been thinking/feeling…

      >>The excitement died down around 2010, and I’m not entirely sure why. Cell-phone raised boys just aren’t as interested in socializing? Testosterone is lower? The war against masculinity reached its triumphant conclusion and most guys think they should be embarrassed to want sex? Online dating and the decline of nightlife as an effective way to meet? Did the seduction community go as far as it could go, and there wasn’t much new left to discover? (No.) One of the spooky things about 2020 is that we’ve entered a time when nothing is cooler than conformity, repeating the Narrative, and zealously advancing the goals and policies of an unprecedentedly huge and powerful global establishment (while still fancying oneself a “rebel”, a Boomer/lefty habit that persists against all the evidence that oneself is absolutely opposed to rebellion).

      It’s hard to imagine that the rise of smartphones has nothing to do with this… there’s a cool book, iGen, by a woman named Jean Twenge, about how mental health indicators nosedive among teens around 2012, by which point pretty much every teen has a smartphone. Now it’s 10 years later and those teens are in their 20s, and still many of them are socially retarded and childlike. There seems to be something about today’s technological, social, and cultural environments that retards growing up and becoming an adult. Smartphones seem to be part of the story, but not the whole story.

      Glad you like the blog… I’m not really in the game right now, maybe won’t be again, so I’ll probably stop updating it at some point. The book collects and organizing the most valuable material, related to sex clubs & non-monogamy, the only fields I’m aware of that no one else has covered effectively. Some girls, you give them permission not to follow the standard pattern of meet -> date -> sex -> commitment -> marriage, and they’re down with it, and it can unlock a kind of abundance hard to appreciate otherwise.

      I wonder what happened to Mystery. He’s got to be in his late 40s or 50s by now. I think his partner/wife/whoever had a kid at some point. That many younger girls seem curiously uninterested in getting laid is still a surprise to me.

      Like

      1. After I wrote the above, I got to thinking… maybe online is simply “good enough.” Like, if I were willing to entertain 5s and 6s, online would probably work for me, in some sense. The guys for whom it’s good enough, do it, and that’s sufficient for them. No need to do something real, like learn how to flirt in real life. That’s consistent with the smartphone thesis.

        Like

  4. My guess is that most guys have become disillusioned: there is no science – and little art – to hitting on chicks.
    After the basics it’s just a numbers game. I also believe that PUA-awareness is greater than ever: PUA-related vids on Youtube get millions of views, which is maybe thousands of times more than what old blogs and forums used to get. Some channels are Based Zeus, Todd V Dating, Bradicus. Channels like How to Beast, FreshhandFit, Richard Cooper sometimes mix it with alpha male and culture war topics. There are countless hours of cold approaching footage which should be more helpful than the typical essays guys write about game.

    Women are also used to drooling over hot guys on social media. As usual, they are more picky. Female demand for casual sex or even relationships is low, especially among the younger ones. They find fuck buddies from their social circles, often starting on Instagram or Facebook.

    In my experience, there is no untapped reserve of women. Cold approaching is a war of attrition against the man, datings apps too. There’s not much to learn from failure, you usually can’t tell what made her to reject you. The lack of results either makes men decide it’s not worth it, or stick to the first or second girl they manage to bag.

    Women seem to prefer “permission style” apps like Tinder where only those men whom women approve of are allowed to contact them.
    They don’t enjoy men who are “not her type” approaching them in public. They still get approached quite often, from what I hear, and they’re rarely delighted when I approach them. It’s just a nuisance usually.

    Like

    1. You mentioned a point that I think was missing from RQ’s post:
      Fitness/ new clothes/ haircut/ working on social skills is not an automatic ticket into nailing beautiful women.

      An average man that does that will still have to go out and get rejected over, and over, and over, dozens of times, for every one woman that will exchange numbers and show up on a date.

      Women are pickier now than ever, while being LESS attractive (fat/ Kool-Aid hair/ bitchy) in general. 60% of American women are overweight and single moms more prevalent than ever.

      So it’s exponentially more work for a man to connect with a woman than ever, and the women are not as slim and feminine as they were when it was easier to meet them.

      I’m 38, and remember life before dating apps and Instagram. I had sex and beautiful girlfriends without knowing game and just being a regular person. Now I have to take dating seriously as a full time job to sleep with below average looking women.

      I did reach a point where I’m content to focus on work, hobbies, travel, etc. I don’t care about getting laid. I feel bad for men who are 20-something now who’ll never know what it was like before Tinder.

      Like

      1. >Fitness/ new clothes/ haircut/ working on social skills is not an automatic ticket into nailing beautiful women.

        Definitely not an automatic ticket. But doing those things well will raise a guy’s hit rate.

        The beautiful chicks are still out there getting railed, and often not by the guys who most dudes might most expect… w/o knowing more about your individual situation, it’s impossible to know what’s happening… https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2020/02/07/write-your-player-blog-its-an-advertisement-but-not-in-the-way-you-think/

        Like

    2. >> there is no science – and little art – to hitting on chicks. After the basics it’s just a numbers game

      Strong disagree here: it is a skill and art, and it is amenable to deliberate practice: https://jamesclear.com/deliberate-practice-theory. Tom Torero and Krauser’s oeuvres are devoted to them developing their hitting-on-chicks skills. I’ve heard infields from other players that show their development.

      As for PUA videos… maybe the knowledge is out there… and it’s not being applied… that’s possible…

      I dunno, cold approach and being social seem to have worked for me, to be working for Red Pill Dad, Nash, others….

      Like

    3. Almost everything you’ve said here is incorrect. As someone who regularly does cold approach, there’s most definitely a skill set and technique to it, and some guys are better than others. It’s more art than science, but art is a practice like medicine, law, teaching, etc.–and the best practitioners are almost magical in their ability to execute.

      You also said there’s “not much” to be learned from failure?

      That’s totally backwards.

      We learn almost everything by failing first. No one gets it right all the time on the first try, and anyone who doesn’t regularly experience failure is either lying or not trying very hard. All major developments in technology, science, industry, business, etc., usually result from a series of failures before the person or team gets it right–precisely because the failures teach them what doesn’t work, but leave a lot of clues and ideas about what might work.

      I won’t lie: the dating environment is tough, and to some extent you’re right, girls are pickier than ever and it is a numbers game. But those numbers can be used to your advantage. I’ve slept with over 30 women (average a 7) since 2018, most of them more than 10 years younger than me–in what other time period in human history was that likely or possible, other than the modern era?

      And if my experience isn’t enough to convince you, my client’s success should. These are guys who weren’t getting laid so they decided to pay for coaching, and now most of them are–often within a phone call or two where we talk about strategy, tactics, and escalation. Some guys need more time of course and everyone starts in a different spot. Do looks, age, status, location, etc. matter? Of course. But if you’re willing to put in the work, you CAN get results, often quicker than you might think.

      Hit me up for coaching man. If you do the intake call and buy a 5 hour package and don’t get laid after that (provided you actually make an effort and aren’t way overweight or something totally disqualifying), I’ll give you your money back. https://redpilldad.blog/coachingrpd/

      Liked by 2 people

  5. There is also another point to consider: nowadays guys live on a cocoon of safety and they have lost the ability to suffer. Rejection is harsh, no matter how often are you used to it. Nowadays people don’t hear about news they don’t agree with, they don’t have bosses screaming at them at work, customers don’t say anything to your face, but write a negative review later. Internet dating is about that, to make rejections softer too.

    In a standard life where you never have a real disappointing moment, putting you out there at the risk of being mocked up, blocked on messaging applications, plainly rejected, it is too much for them.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Ok, this is something that I’ve talked about a little with other game/pickup friends and have a few opinions on.

    First off, TRQ, I’m a big fan of your blog and have been lurking for a couple years. You’re one of the only writers under the “redpill” label that I actually think are worth reading. You’re also one of the reasons that I’m trying to start my own game blog now (as a guy in his 20’s – currently building a backlog of a few posts).

    I think there are a few reasons that game/cold approach is “dying”. As mentioned by another commenter, game-awareness in the general public is still somewhat high. You see normal guys talking about simps, how to get laid on tinder, how nice guys finish last, fuckbois, etc all the time. It’s common sense these days that being a bit of a cocky, fit, asshole gets you laid. It’s not like the public is completely under this bluepill shroud or anything (as much as some “redpillers” would like to believe to make them feel special).

    But I think cold approach (at least in the first-world Western countries that we live in) is becoming less accepted by girls. Obviously, it still works, I have a friend who regularly gets hot SDL’s in NYC, and have met certain pickup figures/coaches that I know still slay in places like Sydney, Vegas, Miami, etc. But game is getting harder in these sorts of places (in every form, cold approach online, social). I think there are several reasons.

    1a) Online dating. A lot of pickup/cold approach is seen as weird by most everyone the way we do it. Girls will accept things that seem like a chance encounter, but most everyone thinks doing “daygame sessions” is weird. When you can meet new girls online, why would guys try something uncomfortable like that?
    1b) I think online dating also increases “sexual market inequality” by increasing access for everyone. This goes beyond just Tinder and includes rich ballers in big cities flying out hot sugar babies and models for vacations and shit. 20 years ago, people couldn’t just find so many hot/rich/cool people online so easily. This makes it harder for average/below average guys to get laid.
    1c) Cold approach is also less efficient than online dating in general. It’s time consuming to find and approach girls. You have to go to clubs and stay out late for nightgame, or search for openable girls on the street/parks/beaches/wherever for daygame. Sure, you can usually get a higher quality girl this way because you have more tools at your disposal, but cold approach is still a time-consuming hobby. And you can get even higher quality (though less efficiently for 99.9% of guys) through social circle.

    2) Instagram. I think this is the biggest reason game is so much harder these days. Even average girls don’t need to get sexual validation from guys in person anymore. They can get it on their phone. I guarantee you the game/PUA community would only be an extremely tiny fraction of what it is today, if the same happened to average guys. Attractive girls know that they can meet (even cool and hot) guys easily for dates whenever they want and the supply is endless. So there’s just not any urgency for them unless the guy is super high value.

    3) Nightclubs are declining, removing a major venue type for cold approach. It’s unclear how much they will bounce back after COVID. (Sad, because nightgame is the must fun way to meet girls IMO)

    4) Stiffer competition, more “game awareness”, and less stigma around sex. I’m actually not sure how important/real this point is. This could be biased by the type of people the I know/see. Guys are wising up to this shit. Sure there are lots of dorky, skinny-fat slobs out there still, but there’s a large portion of young and older guys that go to the gym, dress well, are focused on their careers, and are aware of the importance of things like confidence. Women don’t want the sleazy guy chatting up every girl on the street when they have lots of options they’re more confident in. With platforms like Seeking Arrangements rising in popularity, women can date successful, rich guys and get paid very good money for it. Why would she go on a normal date with a guy who might just pump and dump her, when she can at least get money out of it this way?

    5) Being a player isn’t cool anymore past the age of 22. Now it’s seen as juvenile, sleazy, or even misogynistic by a lot of people. Very different from 2005. Guys want to get laid, but they don’t really want the identity of a player anymore. Though this is very dependent on your social circle

    While game is important, it’s hard to rely solely on game. Women want to date cool, attractive, confident guys that, yes do have attractive personalities (game), but also have cool lives. They want to date the leaders, organizers, artists, etc. Nowadays, the guys I know who sleep with REALLY hot girls in the US with game, are all really pushing over-selling themselves. They are trying to make it seem like they have connections in the girls industry/social scene when they don’t, or that they are much bigger than they are. They have fake pics of them DJing a famous festival on tinder or they’re sugar/salt-daddying on seeking arrangements.

    While you of course need some level of game to get laid a lot, I think that looks and status/lifestyle can often be more important (very dependent on how you’re meeting girls though. Game is probably still the biggest factor in cold approach.)

    There’s a reason that the vast majority of PUA/game guys are moving overseas these days. You can’t sleep with a lot of attractive girls as an average guy in the first-world anglosphere anymore. It’s possible, but it takes a lot of work, and it’s never going to be easy without top looks or status. The days of going out bars and charming your way into the pants of new hot, young American girls every weekend are still declining further.

    I don’t want to discourage guys reading this from getting into game. It’s not a futile pursuit, and is one of the most rewarding things I’ve gotten into in my life. But it’s not easy in places like US, UK, Australia, etc anymore. It’s not that it’s hard to get good at game (it’s not if you have the right mentors/resources, are at least somewhat attractive, and have decent social skills). But even if you’re really good, it’s still time-consuming and challenging.

    Like

    1. >>You’re also one of the reasons that I’m trying to start my own game blog now (as a guy in his 20’s – currently building a backlog of a few posts).

      That’s great… link me when you do… https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2020/02/07/write-your-player-blog-its-an-advertisement-but-not-in-the-way-you-think/ … we need the next gen of guys…

      >>3) Nightclubs are declining, removing a major venue type for cold approach. It’s unclear how much they will bounce back after COVID. (Sad, because nightgame is the must fun way to meet girls IMO)

      I think bars still work, though. I think I linked https://www.asleepthinking.com/blog/how-shaman-bros-killed-1oak but it’s a great take on this, consistent with my overall direction, https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2021/06/07/integrating-smart-drugs-like-mdma-molly-smartly/

      Great comment overall, much to think about here, I do wonder if the sexual inequality/instagram things are the biggest or among the biggest things going on here. The annoying, bitchy friend from this story https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2021/07/08/one-of-the-hard-parts-about-game-and-dating-when-doing-nothing-is-the-best-option/ had out her Bumble account and said she only swipes on tall guys w/ 6 packs, and most of the guys in her convo queue did appear to have ab pics. And this girl was a bitchy, annoying 7. Makes me wonder…

      Like

      1. > I think bars still work, though.

        Yeah, I agree that they do too. I may have come across as too fatalistic in my post- you can still get great results from bars/clubs. But I also agree with your links that bars and clubs aren’t the defacto venue for really hot girls to party and get validation and hookups anymore. Most girls don’t go out to clubs looking to get laid anymore, they use online (or social circle) for that. I also think the bar in major cities is higher now than it was 15 years ago. And you need a little more than just classic 00’s game to do well with cold approach these days. But I’ve met who pull very consistently from nightgame. I’ve also gotten results from bars/clubs as well (though I only started cold approach in 2019, and haven’t done much aside from online since the pandemic).

        > Great comment overall, much to think about here, I do wonder if the sexual inequality/instagram things are the biggest or among the biggest things going on here. The annoying, bitchy friend from this story https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2021/07/08/one-of-the-hard-parts-about-game-and-dating-when-doing-nothing-is-the-best-option/ had out her Bumble account and said she only swipes on tall guys w/ 6 packs, and most of the guys in her convo queue did appear to have ab pics. And this girl was a bitchy, annoying 7.

        Yeah, the casual sex market is just very gender-skewed. Men probably have a higher drive for frequency and variety in sex on average, it’s much easier for men to enjoy casual sex or a ONS, the skew causes guys to work harder and girls to get picker, etc. So with tinder you end up with chubby girls getting pumped and dumped by tall guys with 6 packs. High access and liquidity plus anonymity and no social repercussions.

        It really is amazing for top guys though. If you can push your SMV and game high, you can get crazy results.

        Red-pillers will whine about feminism or something, but I don’t really think this is much of a factor here. Sure maybe some girls will aspire to be more masculine, independent, and even bitchy, but most girls can’t feminism their way out of their biological drives and needs. But if girls have men crawling over nails to get with them, no matter how they act, then a lot of girls will get arrogant and lose any motivation to try to appeal to guys.

        But you can still find plenty of sweet, considerate, fun girls that don’t have their heads up their asses in the US. But very few of 8-10’s are like this.

        Haha, I meant to comment about why game is less popular, but I think it turned into why game is becoming more difficult.

        Like

      2. @RedGardenElixir, Redpill dad does extremely well at night game… it’s never been a specialty for me… I don’t like it much and also, once I figured out non-monogamy, most other night activities came to seem boring, cause they are.

        The last ten years have seen online dating explode, but they have also seen the non-monogamy world explode, and a guy who can ride the non-monogamy wave may not care so much about the online thing, cause he’s too busy meeting women and couples, etc. The sex clubs, the sex parties, they are phone-free, so people socialize in person and don’t post their sexcapades to Instagram, gives it a much better, more wholesome vibe than clubs + bars today.

        I whine about feminism at times, it is genuinely bad… but a little whine goes a long way, and, at the end of the whine, feminism has still colonized minds. But even as it colonizes minds, it is still true that chicks like cool masculine guys and guys like hot feminine chicks, https://nypost.com/2021/07/10/why-progressive-women-want-to-date-men-who-act-conservative.

        Maybe the game is harder, it doesn’t seem immensely harder to me and I’ve been in it a real long time. The things chicks want are eternal, underneath the noise and fury of the online stuff. I have set myself up as counterprogramming to online, to social media, https://theredquest.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/men-game-and-social-media-strategies/, and that seems to work pretty well… I will thread conversations with bits about how Instagram and such suck, and they seem to get good traction. Girls know it’s retarded to spend four hours a day scrolling their phones, they know it’s retarded to thirst for likes from strangers… so there is some market for saying (and meaning) those sorts of things. Will this work for everyone… I don’t know. Has it worked for me? The answer seems to be yes. The best chicks I’ve had over the last 4 – 5 years have done no or very minimal social media… I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

        >>Haha, I meant to comment about why game is less popular, but I think it turned into why game is becoming more difficult.

        Red quest is ideally a forum + venue to have the conversations that aren’t being had elsewhere… so, if you’ve got something interesting to say, and you’re not an asshole, this is the place for you. The “not an asshole” thing is critical because there are numerous venues for people to be assholes, twitter, reddit, wherever….

        Like

    2. One theory RQ, RPD and I have been talking about recently was that OLD has become so obviously the way that dating happens, that it has sucked all the air out of the room. In 2005, if you weren’t finding success with women, you might go to google and type in “how to get laid”, and RSD, r/redpill and all the various PUA communities would immediately welcome you in.

      Initially I was arguing that it’s almost a victim of it’s own success. Everybody knows about PUA so maybe it seems less important because it’s become a part of the cultural fabric. However, I went to google trends to see the relative size of the markets for Tinder vs the manosphere and the manosphere basically doesn’t show up on the graph the minute you add Tinder to it. For younger guys who have only experienced a world where the vast majority of people fucking was via OLD, it could be that they don’t even think to ask the question, to seek out another solution. OLD seems so easy and accessible, if you go on and don’t have any success, you assume there’s no other option. You’re just not an attractive man. Rather than searching for PUA etc, you just keep swiping.

      OLD may be so successful that it sucked up all the air in the room with respect to how men attract women. If you ask friends, or female friends they will ask to see your profile and immediately assume that tweaks to that will be the answer rather than even imagining a different approach. For many mega trends, even given how large people see them to be, they undervalue how powerful these trends are. This is my theory as to how we all (myself included) are seeing OLD, feminism, instagram, etc. Human brains are not designed to be able to appreciate cultural shifts of this magnitude in this short a timeframe.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s